Is Arkansas Using a Youth Football Offense?

With Tim Tebow winning the Heisman, not many people seem to be talking about Darren McFadden. This talented Arkansas running back finished second in Heisman voting this year and in 2006 as well, the first time that has ever happened. Arkansas Coach Houston Nutt, like Urban Meyer at Florida incorporated the Single Wing into his offense. This Arkansas “Wildcat” series was designed to put the defense in conflict horizontally with McFadden in the “Quarterback” role.

Below you see the Offensive Coordinator for Arkansas detailing the base series. These football plays sure look like a lot of the stuff we and other Single Wing teams have been running for decades. Later in the year Arkansas would run additional football plays off of this formation uncluding some using full spinner action. This base 3 play series using jet motion put lots of horizontal pressure on the defense and is nearly identical to our base Jet series. Of course unlike Arkansas and its zone blocking, we use an easier and more effective system specifically designed for youth football. Arkansas ran their “Quarterback”, Darren McFadden very heavily out of this series, whereas most Single Wing teams typically spread the ball around quite a bit more.

My youth football offense has featured the spinner series in 7 of the 8 seasons I’ve used it. We added Jet motion to our base with great results. Like Arkansas, we wanted to stretch the defense horizontally as well as give us another way to run our base plays along with the ability to get to the edge a bit quicker. Unlike Arkansas, we were able to run nearly all of our base football plays not only out of our base set, but out of a spread set and using Jet Motion. By doing it that way it was much easier to put in and very easy for the kids to remember. The only thing that changed was the formation and the motion for the most part. What Jet Motion meant to us was fewer “players in the box” and the ability for our offense to run what we have been running for 8 seasons with a different look. Unlike Arkansas, our biggest plays off the Jet motion was not the “Quarterback” keeper, it was the complementary plays off the Jet motion to our other backs. These football plays to our other backs averaged over 10 yards per carry this season.

While we have to be careful not to let the College game cloud the youth football coaches thinking, it is interesting to see some innovative college teams like Florida and Arkansas turning to offensive concepts that are being run by High School and youth football teams. They use simple misdirection, overwhelming at the point of attack and putting the defense in conflict and they do it without having to throw the ball 50 times a game or run the option which are both tough to put in with youth football teams. When coaching youth football, you don’t want to get caught up in trying to be like the college teams. You often end up asking kids to trực tiếp bóng đá do things they aren’t able to do with limited practice time and younger bodies. If you copy the college guys to the letter you can end up with a scheme that often times does not give your kids the best chance to compete. But when it’s the other way around and the innovators start running the stuff you are running and doing real well with, it’s fun to watch.

Indian football: A humbling defeat, a damning performance and what it means  for the Stimac project

The usual, protectionist stance, has it that the problem could be solved by reducing, through capping, the number of foreign football players. They believe this would give more opportunities for young home-grown footballers to develop, by having more first team opportunities, meantime denied them.

But, footballers from the European Union cannot be prevented from playing in England (or Scotland), since every EU citizen has the legal right to ply their trade in any EU country they choose. A cap on players from other non-European countries could be applied though, and, some are suggesting a capping level of 2 or 3 foreign players per club.

However, the whole idea is predicated on the notion that there is a stream of talented, home-grown footballers who are not being given the opportunity to develop fully, because their clubs’ first team squads have too many foreign stars blocking their development path into the first team.

But if there was such a talented supply, surely clubs would not have to look abroad? And the flower of English talent — the England Euro 2008 squad who all play for top sides and have not been denied their chances — were not good enough. And, remember, the media were lauding the squad as the strongest for decades!

Professional clubs today are businesses who naturally want the biggest return on their investment. All things being equal, if they could buy British players of the same quality and price, they would certainly do so. And if they had enough talent coming through their club systems and academies, there would be less need to buy overseas players. So, the actions of the clubs themselves imply that there just is not the home-grown talent out there, and where there is, it may often be over-priced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.